Hannah Knudsen<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vaccine mandates were \u201cnot supported by science\u201d and did \u201cmore harm than good,\u201d according to the final report from the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, which has concluded its two-year long investigation into the coronavirus pandemic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The subcommittee wrapped up its report \u2014 described as the \u201csingle most thorough review of the pandemic conducted to date\u201d \u2014 this week and highlighted key findings on every aspect of the pandemic \u2014 from its origins to the response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A summary of the report shows<\/a> that the committee concluded that COVID-19 \u201cmost likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China,\u201d and it provided five strong arguments to back the lab leak theory. Those include the facts that the \u201cvirus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature\u201d and the fact that \u201cWuhan is home to China\u2019s foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research at inadequate biosafety levels.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The committee highlighted a variety of findings in various sections of the report, and of course, there is a section devoted to the vaccine mandates, which many Americans were subjected to under President Biden. It was only thanks to the Supreme Court that millions of Americans were saved from losing their jobs as the Biden administration attempted to force the vaccine via the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The high court rejected<\/a> this mandate in January 2022.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A summary of the 520-page report concludes that \u201ccontrary to what was promised, the COVID-19 vaccine did not stop the spread or transmission of the virus.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Further, it notes that the FDA rushed approval of the vaccine in order to meet the Biden administration\u2019s \u201carbitrary mandate timeline.\u201d They did this despite warnings about the dangers of rushing the process and potential consequences, which include adverse effects of the vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the committee found that the vaccine mandates were not supported by science whatsoever and \u201ccaused more harm than good.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe Biden Administration coerced healthy Americans into compliance with COVID-19 vaccine mandates that trampled individual freedoms, harmed military readiness, and disregarded medical freedom to force a novel vaccine on millions of Americans without sufficient evidence to support their policy decisions,\u201d the summary reads, noting that public health officials coordinated with each other to deliberately ignore the reality of natural immunity to the virus. In other words, they failed to craft policy with that reality in mind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Perhaps what is worse, the committee determined that there was mass government failure in the vaccine injury reporting system, which they said \u201ccreated confusion, failed to properly inform the American public about vaccine injuries, and deteriorated public trust in vaccine safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The government was also \u201cfailing to efficiently, fairly, and transparently adjudicate claims for the COVID-19 vaccine injured,\u201d they wrote in the summary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The investigation also found that mask mandates were wholly ineffective, despite the ongoing demonization against those who refused to wear masks at the time. That demonization of unmasked and unvaccinated Americans was very much encouraged by Biden himself, even suggesting that they were unpatriotic.https:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/t\/assets\/html\/tweet-4.html#1436302343419670535<\/p>\n\n\n\n