The study initially did not attract attention, but recent media reports brought it to light.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Journalist Kim Iversen, who on Wednesday reported on the study on \u201cThe Kim Iversen Show<\/a>,\u201d called it an \u201cabsolute bombshell of a story.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Iversen cited as her source an article in The Daily Sceptic<\/a>, also published Wednesday, by five German scientists who have publicly questioned the safety of the vaccines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Danish researchers looked at Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines administered in Denmark between December 2020 and January 2022 and found that batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine could neatly be divided into three groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two of the three groups demonstrated higher-than-normal percentages of severe adverse events in recipients. However, for the third group of batches, a total of zero adverse events were reported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The researchers also examined data indicating which batches were inspected and tested by regulators and discovered that almost none of the batches from the third group \u2014 associated with no severe adverse events \u2014 had been inspected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Iversen, the findings suggest that \u201cmany of the batches of the Pfizer vaccine administered to the public \u2014 up to 30% \u2014 were placebos. And even worse, the evidence points to regulators knowing about it and willingly administering them.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The study\u2019s authors wrote:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe observed variation in SAE [suspected adverse event] rates and seriousness between BTN162b2 vaccine batches in this nationwide study was contrary to the expected homogenous rate and distribution of SAEs between batches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIn conclusion, the results suggest the existence of a batch-dependent safety signal for the BNT162b2 vaccine, and more studies are warranted to explore this preliminary observation and its consequences.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Iversen said these results mean \u201ceither they were actively experimenting on the public or they were covering up for the fact that the vaccines came with numerous side effects.\u201d<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2018This is how placebos would look\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The German scientists first discussed the results of the Danish study last week on a German online talk show, Punkt.Preradovic<\/a>, hosted by journalist Milena Preradovic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to The Daily Sceptic, they analyzed how \u201cthe batches used in Denmark, which are represented by the points in the graph, essentially break down into three groups.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n One set of batches, referred to as the \u201cgreen batches,\u201d accounting for over 60% of the overall sample demonstrated \u201ca moderate or moderately-high level of adverse events associated with them.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Specifically, one severe adverse event was reported per approximately 400 doses in this batch \u2014 much higher than the rate of severe adverse events reported for the influenza vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another set of batches, referred to as the \u201cblue batches,\u201d was \u201cassociated with an extraordinarily high level of adverse events\u201d \u2014 with a rate of reported severe adverse events of 1 in 10 doses, accounting for nearly 50% of the vaccine-related deaths in the sample.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some batches within the \u201cblue\u201d group had an even higher rate of severe adverse events: up to 1 in every 6 doses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, the \u201cblue batches\u201d were administered the least in Denmark, representing less than 5% of the total number of doses in the sample. This led the scientists to note that \u201cthese especially bad batches may perhaps have been quietly pulled from the market by public health authorities.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The third set of batches, referred to as the \u201cyellow batches,\u201d represented approximately 30% of the total number of doses administered in the sample, but were \u201cassociated with literally zero suspected adverse events.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Gerald Dyker, Ph.D.<\/a>, professor of organic chemistry at Ruhr University in Bochum, Germany, and a member of the team of five German scientists calling attention to the Danish study, suggested that \u201cmalicious\u201d observers might conclude \u201cthis is how placebos would look.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWhy would a certain group have absolutely no side effects?\u201d Iversen said. \u201cThese scientists said the only time you get that is in the control group. That\u2019s the group that was given the placebo.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a>\u2018The regulators knew\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The Daily Sceptic reported that when the German researchers compared the batch numbers with publicly available data on the vaccine batches<\/a>, \u201cThey made the startling discovery that almost none of the harmless batches, unlike the very-bad and not-so-bad batches, appear to have been subject to any quality-control testing at all.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWhat they uncovered through public information \u2026 was that some of them were tested and some of them were not,\u201d Iversen said, noting that every single batch in the \u201cblue\u201d group and almost all batches in the \u201cgreen\u201d group were tested by regulators and were then \u201crolled out to the public.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, when it came to the \u201cyellow\u201d batches, Iversen said the researchers found that all but one were not tested by the regulator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dyker told Preradovic, \u201cThis would support the initial suspicion that they are maybe in fact something like placebos,\u201d a point further emphasized by Iversen, who said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cHow could this possibly be? What are the chances that the group that got no side effects whatsoever, that looks like a placebo, that looks like saline solution, what are the chances that none of them would have been tested except one, when all the others were tested in the other groups, practically all of them? The chances are next to nothing.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cDo you know what that showcases right there? That right there shows the regulators knew. They knew they didn\u2019t need to test the saline solution. It would have been a waste of their time, so they didn\u2019t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cAnd they released it to the public, and that was 30% of the doses, and they were placebo and they knew they were placebo. That\u2019s what that looks like.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Observing that many more doses were given from the \u201cblue\u201d and \u201cgreen\u201d groups, Iversen suggested several possible reasons for this, including that the researchers believe when regulators saw the high percentage of severe adverse events in those two groups, \u201cthey quietly pulled\u201d those batches from the market \u201cwithout telling anybody.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n In reference to the \u201cblue\u201d group, which demonstrated an extraordinarily high percentage of severe adverse events, Iversen said, \u201cIt\u2019s possible that this was a different formulation and they rolled it out there as they were experimenting on people.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n She said it could be that it was \u201can intentional batch and that they were experimenting on the people, giving them this extra dose of something that had something different in it,\u201d she added, \u201cbecause it looks like if they were giving people placebos, that they were experimenting on people.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe only other thing that\u2019s possible is that they were covering up for the massive number of side effects,\u201d Iversen said, adding that there was an \u201coutrageous number of side effects, and the only way to mitigate it and to keep the public calm [was] to give them a placebo. That way, the overall rate of side effects will be way lower.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Iversen noted that Denmark has a reporting system for severe adverse events similar to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS<\/a>) in the U.S.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"suspected](\"https:\/\/childrenshealthdefense.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/suspected-adverse-events-chart-1024x653.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n