{"id":13831,"date":"2025-12-24T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-24T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=13831"},"modified":"2025-11-06T16:08:09","modified_gmt":"2025-11-06T21:08:09","slug":"machine-covid-vaccine-worked-exactly-as-designed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=13831","title":{"rendered":"Machine: Covid Vaccine Worked Exactly As Designed"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By\u00a0Grant Mercer<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

BRIEFING<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Grant here. For years, the media and public health \u201cexperts\u201d told us the Covid vaccines were safe, that they\u2019d stay in the arm, and that getting the jab was basically the ultimate patriotic act of compassion. Those who refused the jab were quickly branded \u201cselfish\u201d or even \u201csoulless\u201d and were basically treated like modern-day lepers. But as time has passed, more evidence and buried documents have surfaced showing the mRNA vaccines weren\u2019t nearly as \u201csafe\u201d as advertised. Now it\u2019s becoming painfully clear the vaccine didn\u2019t fail; it worked exactly as designed. Let\u2019s break it down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A new op-ed analysis published at The Brownstone Institute by Dr. David Bell, a former WHO medical officer, has taken all the speculation, confusion, and falsehoods surrounding the mRNA vaccines and laid them all bare. And honestly, it\u2019s both insightful and slightly terrifying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There\u2019s a lot to unpack from Bell\u2019s piece, but one fact stands above the rest: the vaccine never stayed \u201cin the arm.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bell\u2019s findings confirm what many suspected from the start. The vaccine\u2019s components didn\u2019t stay localized. They spread throughout the body, reaching the ovaries, liver, adrenal glands, and even the brain. Pfizer knew this from the jump, starting with its pre-approval animal studies, and regulators knew it too. But instead of warning the public, they just said what they needed to say to secure compliance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SOURCE<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

Modified RNA (mRNA) had not been used on a mass level in humans before. Normal mRNA (messenger RNA or ribonucleic acid) in our bodies is a copy of a segment of our own DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid, our genes) that our cells use to manufacture proteins. Such proteins are then used within the cell or excreted (for example, into the blood as albumin, or cell walls as keratin or hair). This mRNA only lasts hours or days. The mRNA vaccines are modified (one of four bases, uridine, is replaced by pseudouridine). This makes them persist longer than our own mRNA so that they can produce more protein over a much longer period. Studies have shown that this works, with modified RNA and spike protein detectable weeks or months after injection. These were not shocking revelations but intended outcomes of drug design. The problem is that the public were told, in 2020 and 2021, that the vaccines act like their own mRNA and rapidly break down. This sounds safer. The public were deliberately misinformed, an unquestionable breach of basic informed consent, to make them more likely to agree to be vaccinated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When we want a drug to disseminate quickly throughout the body, we often inject it into a muscle. We do this with hydrocortisone to treat allergic reactions, or penicillin to ensure that it spreads quickly to wherever an infection is. Muscles have a lot of tiny blood and lymph vessels that carry injected material to the large vessels from where it is pumped through the body in the bloodstream. While the lipid nanoparticles enclosing the mRNA vaccines are designed to enter cells quickly, it is inevitable that quite a lot will go far beyond the muscle. Before the Covid vaccines were approved,\u00a0studies by Pfizer\/BioNTech\u00a0using the same lipid but enclosing a fluorescent marker showed just that (and presumably similar studies not in the public domain by Moderna show the same). About 25% or so left the muscle and\u00a0went around the body, as any competent doctor or pharmacist would expect.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Then there were the famous claims that the vaccines were \u201csafe for pregnancy.\u201d Yep, you guessed it\u2026 that wasn\u2019t entirely true either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite early animal data showing fertility issues and fetal abnormalities, the CDC and WHO pushed the vaccine for pregnant women and children without long-term human trials. Informed consent was literally tossed out the window.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The reason why many medical professionals and our regulatory bodies allowed mRNA vaccines to be given to pregnant women and children without good data is a mystery to many. It\u2019s a good question for people to directly ask the medical practitioners who prescribed it, noting the information above that the manufacturers themselves should agree with. Asking questions is often a good idea. Certainly, the messaging that it is safe in pregnancy was not based on any good evidence, because we did not know in humans and the actual Phase 3 trials by Pfizer and Moderna avoided addressing that question. We only knew, from\u00a0Pfizer\/BioNTech\u2019s data\u00a0on rats, that it\u00a0greatly increased\u00a0both failure to become pregnant and a wide range of fetal malformations compared to unvaccinated rats from the same batch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Animal studies showing reduced fertility or deformed babies would normally lead to more trials, but they didn\u2019t. Why? That is a question for Pfizer, Moderna and our regulatory agencies. It seems, from the Australian Therapeutic Drug Administration\u2019s (TGA) report, that such genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies (for DNA mutations and cancer) were cut short or ignored because the TGA did not think they would last very long (though, as noted above, they were designed to). The name of the products was also changed from \u2018genetic therapeutics\u2019 (which generally require such studies) to \u2018vaccines\u2019 (which don\u2019t). Science can be quite special.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

But what\u2019s most shocking about Bell\u2019s essay is how the entire vaccine, and the science behind it, were essentially redefined for political convenience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The reclassification of mRNA from \u201cgene therapy\u201d to \u201cvaccine\u201d quietly removed the need for the genotoxicity and cancer studies that would normally have been required. This wasn\u2019t a minor bureaucratic adjustment, folks; it was a full-blown regulatory escape hatch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bell also reminds readers that the entire Covid era served as a moral stress test, and as we witnessed, nearly every institution failed. Doctors followed orders. Politicians followed money. The public followed fear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DEBRIEFING<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

What Dr. Bell\u2019s analysis makes painfully clear is that Covid wasn\u2019t just a health crisis; it was a crisis in public trust. The vaccine rollout exposed something far more dangerous than a virus: the absolute corruption of science when it\u2019s merged with politics and profit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public health agencies didn\u2019t simply make mistakes; they made calculated choices. They twisted definitions, buried data, and expertly silenced dissent. They told people what was \u201csafe\u201d and \u201cpatriotic,\u201d not because it was 100% true, but because it served a larger agenda. And doctors became enforcers of a narrative rather than those who serve public health.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The biggest deception here wasn\u2019t that the vaccine failed; it\u2019s that it succeeded exactly as intended: as a test of obedience, compliance, and how far the whole system could go before people started asking questions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By\u00a0Grant Mercer BRIEFING Grant here. For years, the media and public health \u201cexperts\u201d told us the Covid vaccines were safe, that they\u2019d stay in the arm, and that getting the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":13836,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[839,854,445,973,974,608],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-infertility","category-leaky-vaccines","category-policies-politics","category-vaccine-failure","category-vaccine-long-term-safety","category-vaccine-safety"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13831"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13831\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13834,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13831\/revisions\/13834"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13836"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}