{"id":2822,"date":"2021-08-25T20:38:40","date_gmt":"2021-08-25T20:38:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=2822"},"modified":"2021-08-25T20:38:40","modified_gmt":"2021-08-25T20:38:40","slug":"the-bizarre-refusal-to-apply-cost-benefit-analysis-to-covid-debates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=2822","title":{"rendered":"The Bizarre Refusal to Apply Cost-Benefit Analysis to COVID Debates"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Are those who oppose a ban on cars or a radical reduction in speed limits sociopaths, given the huge number of people they are knowingly consigning to death or maiming?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Authors: <\/a><\/td>Glenn Greenwald<\/a> 5 hr ago 285<\/a>536<\/a><\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In virtually every realm of public policy<\/strong>, Americans embrace policies which they know will kill people, sometimes large numbers of people. They do so not because they are psychopaths but because they are rational: they assess that those deaths that will inevitably result from the policies they support are worth it<\/em> in exchange for the benefits those policies provide. This rational cost-benefit analysis, even when not expressed in such explicit or crude terms, is foundational to public policy debates \u2014 except when it comes to COVID, where it has been bizarrely declared off-limits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The quickest and most guaranteed way to save hundreds of thousands of lives with policy changes would be to ban the use of automobiles, or severely restrict their usage to those authorized by the state on the ground of essential need (e.g., ambulances or food-delivery vehicles), or at least lower the nationwide speed limit to 25 mph. Any of those policies would immediately prevent huge numbers of human beings from dying. Each year, according to<\/a> the Center for Disease Control (CDC), \u201c1.35 million people are killed on roadways around the world,\u201d while \u201ccrashes are a leading cause of death in the United States for people aged 1\u201354.\u201d Even with seat belts and airbags, a tragic number of life-years are lost given how many young people die or are left permanently and severely disabled by car accidents. Studies over the course of decades have demonstrated<\/a> that even small reductions<\/a> in speed limits save many lives, while radical reductions \u2014 supported by almost nobody \u2014 would eliminate most if not all deaths from car crashes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/a>
Center for Disease Control, 2020<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Given how many deaths and serious injuries would be prevented, why is nobody clamoring for a ban on cars, or at least severe restrictions on who can drive (essential purposes only) or how fast (25 mph)? Is it because most people are just sociopaths who do not care about the huge number of lives lost by the driving policies they support, and are perfectly happy to watch people die or be permanently maimed as long as their convenience is not impeded? Is it because they do not assign value to the lives of other people, and therefore knowingly support policies \u2014 allowing anyone above 15 years old to drive, at high speeds \u2014 that will kill many children along with adults?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That may explain the motivation scheme for a few people, but in general, the reason is much simpler and less sinister. It is because we employ a rational framework of cost-benefit analysis, whereby, when making public policy choices, we do not examine only one side of the ledger (number of people who will die if cars are permitted) but also consider the immense costs generated by policies that would prevent those deaths (massive limits on our ability to travel, vastly increased times to get from one place to another, restrictions on what we can experience in our lives, enormous financial costs from returning to the pre-automobile days). So foundational is the use of this cost-benefit analysis that it is embraced and touted by everyone from right-wing economists to the left-wing European environmental policy group CIVITAS, which defines it<\/a> this way:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Social Cost Benefit Analysis [is] a decision support tool that measures and weighs various impacts of a project or policy. It compares project costs (capital and operating expenses) with a broad range of (social) impacts, e.g. travel time savings, travel costs, impacts on other modes, climate, safety, and the environment.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This framework, above all else, precludes an absolutist approach to rational policy-making. We never opt for a society-altering policy on the ground that \u201cany lives saved make it imperative to embrace\u201d precisely because such a primitive mindset ignores all the countervailing costs which this life-saving policy would generate (including, oftentimes, loss of life as well: banning planes, for instance, would save lives by preventing deaths from airplane crashes, but would also create its own new deaths by causing more people to drive cars).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While arguments are common about how this framework should be applied and which specific policies are ideal, the use of cost-benefit analysis as the primary formula we use is uncontroversial \u2014 at least it was until the COVID pandemic began. It is now extremely common in Western democracies for large factions of citizens to demand that any measures<\/em> undertaken to prevent COVID deaths are vital, regardless of the costs imposed by those policies. Thus, this mentality insists, we must keep schools closed to avoid the contracting by children of COVID regardless of the horrific costs<\/em> which eighteen months or two years of school closures impose on all children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is impossible to overstate the costs imposed on children of all ages from the sustained, enduring and severe disruptions to their lives justified in the name of COVID. Entire books could be written, and almost certainly will be, on the multiple levels of damage children are sustaining, some of which \u2014 particularly the longer-term ones \u2014 are unknowable (long-term harms from virtually every aspect of COVID policies \u2014 including COVID itself, the vaccines, and isolation measures, are, by definition, unknown). But what we know for certain is that the harms to children from anti-COVID measures are severe and multi-pronged. One of the best mainstream news accounts documenting those costs was a January, 2021 <\/a>BBC <\/a><\/em>article<\/a> headlined \u201cCovid: The devastating toll of the pandemic on children.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The \u201cdevastating toll\u201d referenced by the article is not the death count from COVID for children, which, even in the world of the Delta variant, remains vanishingly small. The latest CDC data<\/a> reveals that the grand total of children under 18 who have died in the U.S. from COVID since the start of the pandemic<\/em> sixteen months ago is 361 \u2014 in a country of 330 million people, including 74.2 million people under 18. Instead, the \u201cdevastating toll\u201d refers to multi-layered harm to children from the various lockdowns, isolation measures, stay-at-home orders, school closures, economic suffering and various other harms that have come from policies enacted to prevent the spread of the virus:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From increasing rates of mental health problems to concerns about rising levels of abuse and neglect and the potential harm being done to the development of babies, the pandemic is threatening to have a devastating legacy on the nation’s young. . . .<\/p>

The closure of schools is, of course, damaging to children’s education. But schools are not just a place for learning. They are places where kids socialize, develop emotionally and, for some, a refuge from troubled family life.<\/p>

Prof Russell Viner, president of the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, perhaps put it most clearly when he told MPs on the Education Select Committee earlier this month: “When we close schools we close their lives.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

For More Information: https:\/\/greenwald.substack.com\/p\/the-bizarre-refusal-to-apply-cost<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Are those who oppose a ban on cars or a radical reduction in speed limits sociopaths, given the huge number of people they are knowingly consigning to death or maiming? […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2823,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[767,101,265,425,445,446,517],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cost-benefit","category-covid-19","category-isolation","category-pediatric-health","category-policies-politics","category-policy","category-school-health"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2822"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2822\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2823"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}