{"id":5047,"date":"2022-07-10T19:33:45","date_gmt":"2022-07-10T19:33:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=5047"},"modified":"2022-07-10T19:33:45","modified_gmt":"2022-07-10T19:33:45","slug":"austrian-minister-of-health-doctors-are-liable-for-jab-injuries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=5047","title":{"rendered":"Austrian Minister of Health: Doctors are Liable for Jab Injuries"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Authors Michelle Edwards<\/a> July 7, 2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Austrian MP Mag. Gerald Hauser recently posed demanding questions<\/a> to the country\u2019s Minister of Health Johannes Rauch concerning liability surrounding the COVID-19 jabs. Rauch\u2019s responses indicate that medical professionals\u2014who blindly followed the \u201cevidence-less\u201d assurances from the ministry that the shots were safe\u2014could very likely be held responsible in the event of vaccination damage.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Specifically, the Minister of Health\u2019s answers shows doctors would be required to provide adequate information about possible dangers and harmful consequences of the injections in advance so individuals can make an \u201cinformed and free decision.\u201d If they fail to do so, medical professionals could face penalties of up to 14,000 euros. According to settled case law with the Austrian Supreme Court, Rauch further explained the implications for doctors, stating:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe doctor is obligated to inform patients about the possible dangers and harmful consequences of the treatment. There is also an obligation to inform about vaccinations. Before the vaccination is carried out, there is an obligation to inform the person to be vaccinated and\u2014if this [person] is not yet capable of making decisions\u2014 one with legal representation in the area of the person entrusted with care and upbringing (legal guardian, usually a parent) about the disease to be prevented and the vaccination so that they can give consent to the vaccination.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rauch, who mandated the injections for all Austrian citizens (and quietly ended<\/a> the mandate in late June), documented that doctors must provide the information to protect the freedom of the decision of the person concerned. Rauch wrote that for individuals to be objectively enlightened, they should be given the information required to understand the nature, importance, and scope of a medical measure, including COVID-19 \u201cvaccines.\u201d When asked what are the consequences for doctors if they fail to provide patients with sufficient information, Rauch responded:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis question can only be answered to the effect that a lack of clarification [is] a violation of medical standards represent[ing] professional duties. This can be administrative and\/or disciplinary, be punished, and result in legal liability consequences.\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The dispute between conservative Freedom Party member Hauser and progressive Green Alternative member Rauch over the experimental COVID-19 \u201cvaccines\u201d is not new. Wochenblick<\/em><\/a> (WB)<\/em> reported that as early as June 2021, vaccine damage liability could fall on doctors if the patient has not been sufficiently informed in advance about the potentially harmful consequences of the injection, such as the many well-known and severe side effects. According to WB<\/em>, Hauser has repeatedly stressed, \u201cVaccination is the problem, not the disease.\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hauser\u2014who has promoted the use of Ivermectin<\/a> and stated<\/a> the W.H.O. is abolishing democracy\u2014also asked Rauch what information or training has been furnished to the doctors dolling out the COVID injections so they can provide objective and sufficient information to their patients. As pointed out by WB<\/em>, Rauch\u2019s answers highlight the tremendous influence the massive pharmaceutical industry<\/a> has over medical professionals and the entire global healthcare system. In 2020, Pfizer<\/a> pushed over 31 million euros into Austria\u2019s healthcare system. Given Pfizer\u2019s consistent history of concealing the highly damaging effects of the mRNA shots, it seems safe to assume sufficient information from big pharma about adverse events is lacking. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Along with Pfizer\u2019s<\/a> pumping of funds into Austria<\/a>, Rauch explained that there had been 143 training courses for doctors on COVID-19 vaccinations. According to Rauch, from 2020 to 2022, the diploma further training program (DFP) of the Austrian Medical Association has held a total of 273 DFP training courses on the subject of \u201cvaccination,\u201d with 143 DFP of them specifically on the subject of the COVID-19 shots. Still, according to DFP\u2019s website, the program is sponsored by Sanofi, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and others. Thus, similar to Pfizer, the question persists regarding the depth of information offered on adverse vaccine events. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Share of people vaccinated against COVID-19, Jul 6, 2022<\/a><\/h1>\n\n\n\n