<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Authors: Debra Heine<\/a> August 16, 2022 <\/p>\n\n\n\n More than 40 percent of pregnant women who participated in Pfizer\u2019s mRNA COVID vaccine trial suffered miscarriages, according internal Pfizer documents,<\/a> recently released under court order. Despite this, Pfizer, and the Biden administration insisted that the vaccines were safe for pregnant women. Out of 50 pregnant women, 22 of them lost their babies, according to an analysis of the documents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In a January court ruling, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas, ordered the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents were released, totaling more than 300,000 pages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The nonprofit group, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, sued the FDA last September, after the agency denied its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to expedite the release of mRNA vaccine review documents. In a November 2021 joint status report, the FDA proposed releasing only 500 pages of the documents a month, which would have taken up to 75 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trial documents<\/a> released in April revealed that Pfizer had to hire 1,800 additional full-time employees<\/a> in the first half of 2021 to deal with \u201cthe large increase\u201d of adverse reactions to its COVID vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine was made available under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) on Dec. 11, 2020. By February of 2021, the company was seeing so many safety signals, including in pregnant and breastfeeding mothers, <\/a>it had to immediately hire 600 employees to process the data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A batch of documents released in late July showed that 44 percent of women who were pregnant during the trial suffered miscarriages, feminist author and journalist Dr. Naomi Wolf revealed on Steve Bannon\u2019s War Room podcast. Wolf has been spearheading research and analysis of the Pfizer documents through her website Daily Clout.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n In the past, only 10 to 15 percent<\/a> of known pregnancies ended in miscarriage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cPfizer took those deaths of babies\u2014those spontaneous abortions and miscarriages\u2014and recategorized them as recovered\/resolved adverse effects,\u201d Wolf told Bannon. \u201cIn other words, if you lost your baby, it was categorized by Pfizer as resolved adverse event, like a headache that got better,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Wolf said adverse event cutoff report showing the miscarriages was March 13, 2021, and the FDA received the report on April 1, 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, the FDA had this data nearly a year and a half ago, and instead raising an alarm, they, along with the CDC, went ahead and recommended the experimental injections for expectant mothers anyway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cOver a year ago, the FDA received this report that out of 50 pregnant women, 22 of them lost their babies, and they did not say anything,\u201d Wolf said, choking back tears. \u201cThus the FDA was aware of the horrifying rate of fetal death by the start of April 2021 and were silent.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The CDC, as recently as last month, still recommended the experimental mRNA vaccines for pregnant and breastfeeding \u201cpeople.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cCOVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all people 6 months and older. This includes people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future,\u201d the CDC claims in a July 2022 post on its website.<\/a> \u201cCDC also recommends COVID-19 vaccines for infants 6 months and older who\u2019s mother was vaccinated or had a COVID infection before or while pregnant.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The FDA and CDC could conceivably claim they were unaware of high rate of miscarriages in the trial because Pfizer attempted to obscure the data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cPfizer notes the miscarriages as serious adverse events with moderate or severe toxicity ratings,\u201d Wolf explained. \u201cHowever, all of them were recategorized, by Pfizer, in the internal documents under the category of adverse events that were \u2018recovered\u2019 or \u2018resolved.’\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Wolf noted that the Pfizer trial data correlates with the massive increase in miscarriages seen worldwide since the vaccine rollouts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIf you extrapolate, globally, to all the pregnant women who are injected, it could explain what we\u2019re seeing now of a baby die-off. 200 percent rise in neonatal deaths or spontaneous abortions and miscarriages in Scotland,\u201d she said, adding, \u201c86 babies died in Ontario when they usually have five or six [per quarter], and in Israel, a 34 percent rise of spontaneous abortions and miscarriages to vaccine.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Back in January<\/a>, three military doctors who had access to vaccination data in the DoD\u2019s Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) disclosed that miscarriages and cancers among members of the US military had increased by about 300 percent in 2021 over the five year average.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These alarming safety signals were among several others brought to light by Thomas Renz, a member of America\u2019s Frontline Doctors\u2019<\/a> legal team, during a panel discussion<\/a> convened by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) in January.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The CDC, however, still maintains on its website that \u201cevidence continues to build showing that: COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The agency also claimed \u201cthere is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems in women or men,\u201d despite recent studies showing otherwise.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Dr. James Thorp, an physician MD board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine, said in a recent interview that he has seen a massive spike in fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes after the mass vaccination campaign began.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dr. Thorp told Epoch Times he has practiced obstetrics for over 42 years and sees 6,000\u20137,000 high-risk OB patients a year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The obstetrician declared that the use of the experimental COVID vaccines on expectant mothers \u201cbroke all the rules.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWe have always been guided by that principle, that longstanding, six millennia principle\u2014the golden rule of pregnancy\u2014you never, ever<\/em> use an investigational drug, a new substance, a new drug, a new vaccine\u2014even if there\u2019s a potential benefit,\u201d he said. \u201cYou don\u2019t ever<\/em> use a new substance in pregnancy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thorp said that in his practice, he\u2019s seen a \u201csignificant increase\u201d in problems, including \u201cextraordinarily abnormal menstrual periods\u201d before pregnancy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe vaccine I\u2019m very concerned about and I do believe that in pregnancy, it\u2019s contraindicated,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He said that his attempts to disclose these adverse events has been hampered by the imposition of gag orders on physicians and nurses that were imposed in September 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In September of 2021, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) put out a statement<\/a> in support of the Federation of State Medical Boards\u2019 (FSMB) contention that \u201cproviding misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine contradicts physicians\u2019 ethical and professional responsibilities.\u201d The ABOG said physicians disseminating \u201cmisinformation\u201d would be subject to \u201cdisciplinary actions, including suspension or revocation of their medical license.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The ACOG, like the CDC, recommends the experimental injections for \u201cpregnant people.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n