{"id":7990,"date":"2023-10-29T18:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-10-29T22:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=7990"},"modified":"2023-10-29T18:00:00","modified_gmt":"2023-10-29T22:00:00","slug":"dna-contamination-and-cancer-causing-sv40-found-in-pfizers-covid-injections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=7990","title":{"rendered":"DNA Contamination and Cancer-Causing \u2018SV40\u2019 found in Pfizer\u2019s COVID Injections"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

BY THE EXPOS\u00c9, October 22, 2023<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s not just the spike protein and the mRNA that are a problem. Both Pfizer and Moderna covid injections also have DNA contamination and Pfizer\u2019s covid injection contains SV40 promoters. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Microbiologist Kevin McKernan pioneered research on testing some of the COVID-19 vaccine vials and discovered unacceptable levels of double-stranded DNA plasmids floating around.  This is DNA contamination.  He found the contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

During an interview with Peter Sweden<\/a>, Sasha Latypova said that DNA contamination is \u201ca huge problem because this is replication competent plasmid, it can then invade human cells, it can invade the bacterial cells that live in your gut. So, they go into the bacteria they replicate there, they replicate antibiotic-resistant genes\u2026it can cause sepsis, it can cause cancer, all sorts of issues.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The World Council for Health<\/a> (\u201cWCH\u201d) stated that a red line has been crossed.  \u201cDNA contamination of mRNA \u2018vaccines\u2019 poses a risk to everyone on the planet,\u201d WCH said<\/a>. \u201cReplicable DNA, so-called plasmids, in both the monovalent and bivalent vaccines, which should not be there at all \u2026 We can only speculate how it will end, but what needs to happen today after the publication of the paper by McKernan et al (2023)<\/a><\/em> is an immediate stop of the \u2018covid-19 vaccine\u2019 program.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Pfizer\u2019s mRNA injection, McKernan also discovered Simian Virus 40 (\u201cSV40\u201d) promoters which are tied to cancer development in humans. He emphasised that the SV40 found is a viral piece, it is not the whole virus.  However, it still presents a risk of driving cancer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SV40 or Simian Virus 40  was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells<\/a> when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the inactivated polio vaccine (\u201cIPV\u201d) and the oral or \u201clive\u201d polio vaccine (\u201cOPV\u201d) developed by Dr. Albert Sabin. When it was discovered that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a federal law was passed in 1961<\/a> that required that no vaccines contain this virus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kanekoa The Great tweeted<\/a> two audio\/video transcripts.  One of a recent interview with McKernan explaining his discoveries and another of a Japanese professor expressing his concerns about these discoveries.  We have republished these transcripts below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

DNA Contamination and SV40 Discovered<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

McKernan joined Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz<\/em> on Friday to warn that there is no quality control in the manufacturing process of these vaccines. If his findings turn out to be widespread, it could portend an even greater risk for anaphylaxis, blood clotting, developing resistance to antibiotics, gene integration risk, and long-term production of spike protein within the body.  You can listen to an audio of the interview on Apple podcasts HERE<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

During the interview, McKernan said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt\u2019s in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didn\u2019t have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, you\u2019ll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector that\u2019s used to make the RNA\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there\u2019s any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware there\u2019s a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt least on the Pfizer side of things, it has what\u2019s known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. It\u2019s not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If you\u2019re not careful with how you manufacture these things, and you have excess amounts of this DNA, your concern for genome integration goes up\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIf you get an SV40 promoter in front of an oncogene, you will end up with a high expression of a gene that can drive cancer, it will be a very rare event, but you don\u2019t need many of these cells to be hit with something like this for it to take off. SV40 actually plagued, granted it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine is one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. So, there\u2019s a history of being concerned over SV40.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cHaving the promoter inside some of these vectors isn\u2019t necessary. It seems to be a superfluous oversight they could have eliminated, yet it\u2019s still there because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didn\u2019t really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So, that piece of DNA is something we really need to pay attention to. We\u2019ve made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So several researchers around the globe are now running these assays to look for how much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further reading:<\/p>\n\n\n\n