{"id":8158,"date":"2023-11-10T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-11-10T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=8158"},"modified":"2023-11-10T06:00:00","modified_gmt":"2023-11-10T11:00:00","slug":"ocular-symptoms-among-nonhospitalized-patients-who-underwent-covid-19-testing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/?p=8158","title":{"rendered":"Ocular Symptoms among Nonhospitalized Patients Who Underwent COVID-19 Testing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Sapna S. Gangaputra<\/a>, MD, MPH\u2217<\/sup>\u00a0and\u00a0Shriji N. Patel<\/a>, MD, Ophthalmology.<\/a>\u00a02020 Oct; 127(10): 1425\u20131427.\u00a0Published online 2020 Jun 22.\u00a0doi:\u00a010.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.06.037<\/a>, PMCID:\u00a0PMC7308009PMID:\u00a032585259<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, which causes a syndrome known as coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), has been designated a global pandemic by the World Health Organization.1<\/sup><\/a> The vast majority of patients with COVID-19 are advised to isolate and recuperate at home. The stay-at-home restrictions and limited access to ambulatory ophthalmology care inadvertently may delay the recognition of ocular signs and symptoms associated with COVID-19.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Currently, we have minimal data on the incidence and severity of ocular manifestations of nonhospitalized COVID-19\u2013positive patients. Characterizing ocular manifestations in this cohort will help ophthalmologists learn how, if at all, this virus affects the eye in an ambulatory population. To answer these questions, an electronic Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)2<\/sup><\/a> ,<\/sup> 3<\/sup><\/a> survey was developed (Appendix 1<\/a>, available at www.aaojournal.org<\/a>), and distributed to participants of the COVID Volunteer Research database, which was created by the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research. Every adult who underwent testing for COVID-19 at one of Vanderbilt University Medical Center\u2019s walk-in locations was provided the opportunity to volunteer to participate in future research studies. Patients were tested either because of COVID-19\u2013like symptoms or because they were at risk for occupational reasons or after exposure to an affected person. The database is maintained at a central secure location, and the survey was approved exempt by the institutional review board\/ethics committee of Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The study was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Study data were collected and managed using REDCap2<\/sup><\/a> ,<\/sup> 3<\/sup><\/a> tools hosted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The survey questionnaire was sent to participants independent of their COVID-19 test results. Basic demographic questions as well as underlying medical and ocular history were investigated. Allergy questions were added to tease out seasonal ocular and systemic symptoms that are common in the middle Tennessee region and may be mistaken for COVID-19 during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics were performed for this analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The survey was distributed to approximately 1100 eligible persons who had provided written informed consent. Participants responded to the survey 1 to 4 weeks after receiving the results of their COVID-19 testing. A total of 458 surveys were completed during the study period. Eight surveys were removed from the analysis because of incomplete or missing data. Of the remaining 450 surveys, 144 (32.0%) were completed by persons showing positive results for COVID-19, and 306 (68.0%) were completed by persons showing negative results for COVID-19 (Table S1<\/a>, available at www.aaojournal.org<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among COVID-19\u2013positive patients, the most common nonocular symptoms experienced were muscle aches or weakness (77.1%), cough (74.3%), headache (73.6%), loss of smell or taste (69.4%), and fever (68.1%). Other than the loss of smell or taste, these symptoms were experienced at a similar rate in respondents showing negative results for COVID-19, which is not surprising because they underwent testing as a result of the presence of flu-like symptoms (Table S2<\/a>, available at www.aaojournal.org<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Approximately 47% (68\/144) of COVID-19\u2013positive patients reported at least 1 overlapping eye-related symptom. The most commonly reported ocular symptoms in survey respondents showing positive results for COVID-19 were eye pain (19.4%), photophobia (13.9%), flashes or floaters (11.8%), blurry vision (11.1%), and red eyes (10.4%). Only 20.6% (14\/68) noted ocular symptoms before systemic symptoms, with 26.5% (18\/68) of respondents still experiencing persistent eye symptoms despite recovery from systemic illness. Notably, 54% (164\/306) of COVID-19\u2013negative patients reported at least 1 ocular symptom. No statistically significant differences were found favoring these symptoms in COVID-19\u2013positive patients compared with COVID-19\u2013negative patients in our cohort. Red eye (21.9%) and excessive tearing (17.6%) were found at a significantly higher rate in COVID-19\u2013negative survey respondents (Table 1<\/a> ). Similarly, 15.2% (25\/164) noted ocular symptoms before systemic symptoms, with 23.2% of respondents (38\/164) still experiencing persistent eye symptoms despite recovery from systemic illness, which was not statistically different from the COVID-19\u2013positive cohort. Although more than 50% of the entire surveyed cohort reported some history of environmental allergy, no statistically significant difference was found between COVID-19\u2013positive patients (53.5%) and COVID-19\u2013negative patients (54.9%; Table S3<\/a>, available at www.aaojournal.org<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table 1<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ocular Symptoms Experienced by Patients Showing Positive and Negative Results for Coronavirus 2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Symptom<\/strong><\/td>Positive Results, No. (%)<\/strong><\/td>Negative Results, No. (%)<\/strong><\/td>Odds Ratio<\/strong><\/td>P<\/em><\/strong> Value<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/thead>
Red eyes<\/td>15 (10.4)<\/td>67 (21.9)<\/td>0.41<\/td>0.0024<\/td><\/tr>
Eye pain<\/td>28 (19.4)<\/td>56 (18.3)<\/td>1.08<\/td>0.8186<\/td><\/tr>
Epiphora<\/td>10 (6.9)<\/td>54 (17.6)<\/td>0.35<\/td>0.0016<\/td><\/tr>
Photophobia<\/td>20 (13.9)<\/td>60 (19.6)<\/td>0.66<\/td>0.147<\/td><\/tr>
Blurry vision<\/td>16 (11.1)<\/td>39 (12.7)<\/td>0.86<\/td>0.7287<\/td><\/tr>
Diplopia<\/td>2 (1.4)<\/td>5 (1.6)<\/td>0.85<\/td>0.8264<\/td><\/tr>
Flashes or floaters<\/td>17 (11.8)<\/td>33 (10.8)<\/td>1.11<\/td>0.7017<\/td><\/tr>
Scotoma<\/td>2 (1.4)<\/td>7 (2.3)<\/td>0.60<\/td>0.5189<\/td><\/tr>
Tunnel vision<\/td>5 (3.5)<\/td>7 (2.3)<\/td>1.54<\/td>0.4765<\/td><\/tr>
Flickering lights<\/td>3 (2.1)<\/td>5 (1.6)<\/td>1.28<\/td>0.7505<\/td><\/tr>
Other<\/td>8 (5.6)<\/td>29 (9.5)<\/td>0.56<\/td>0.1524<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Open in a separate window<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

To date, the reports on ocular findings have been limited. Conjunctivitis4<\/sup><\/a> has been reported; however, recent reports show a low prevalence of conjunctivitis and chemosis in COVID-19\u2013hospitalized patients.5<\/sup><\/a> ,<\/sup> 6<\/sup><\/a> OCT and retinal findings of 12 adult patients from S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil, described cotton-wool spots and microhemorrhages, suggesting ischemic changes in the papillomacular bundle with no signs of intraocular inflammation.7<\/sup><\/a> As clinics start to reopen, we must anticipate the ocular conditions that could represent either direct end-organ damage resulting from COVID-19 infection or sequelae after cytokine release, thromboembolic phenomena, or secondary ischemic events.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In our cohort, the most common symptoms experienced were red eye, photophobia, epiphora, and eye pain. Interestingly, some of these symptoms were more likely to be noted among COVID-19\u2013negative patients rather than COVID-19\u2013positive patients. Although it is important to take all necessary precautions, we hope these data will reassure patients and physicians that every red eye is not necessarily a sign of COVID-19. To elucidate further why several patients may have red eyes and seemingly allergic ocular symptoms, we explored the history of drug and environmental allergies among cohorts. The COVID-19\u2013negative patients showed higher rates of self-reported drug allergies; this is of unclear clinical significance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This analysis has several limitations. The analysis is based on patient reports, and therefore is subject to recall bias and selection bias. We received responses from 458 of more than 1000 participants, which may suggest patients with ocular symptoms were more likely to respond to a study about ocular associations with COVID-19. The study was conducted in an urban setting where the prevalence of COVID-19 was higher than in surrounding counties, and our respondents were predominantly white. The strengths of the study are the large number of responses from patients who were not hospitalized, which is more than 80% of affected COVID-19 patients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, this retrospective patient survey found no association between ocular symptoms and COVID-19 positivity in an outpatient population.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Supplementary Data<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table S1:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click here to view.<\/a>(110K, pdf)<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table S2:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click here to view.<\/a>(96K, pdf)<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table S3:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click here to view.<\/a>(98K, pdf)<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Appendix 1:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click here to view.<\/a>(41K, pdf)<\/sup><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sapna S. Gangaputra, MD, MPH\u2217\u00a0and\u00a0Shriji N. Patel, MD, Ophthalmology.\u00a02020 Oct; 127(10): 1425\u20131427.\u00a0Published online 2020 Jun 22.\u00a0doi:\u00a010.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.06.037, PMCID:\u00a0PMC7308009PMID:\u00a032585259 The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, which causes a syndrome known […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8163,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[161,416,634],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-eyesight","category-pain","category-vision"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8158\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cov19longhaulfoundation.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}