By Grant Mercer

BRIEFING

Grant here. For years, the media and public health “experts” told us the Covid vaccines were safe, that they’d stay in the arm, and that getting the jab was basically the ultimate patriotic act of compassion. Those who refused the jab were quickly branded “selfish” or even “soulless” and were basically treated like modern-day lepers. But as time has passed, more evidence and buried documents have surfaced showing the mRNA vaccines weren’t nearly as “safe” as advertised. Now it’s becoming painfully clear the vaccine didn’t fail; it worked exactly as designed. Let’s break it down.

A new op-ed analysis published at The Brownstone Institute by Dr. David Bell, a former WHO medical officer, has taken all the speculation, confusion, and falsehoods surrounding the mRNA vaccines and laid them all bare. And honestly, it’s both insightful and slightly terrifying.

There’s a lot to unpack from Bell’s piece, but one fact stands above the rest: the vaccine never stayed “in the arm.”

Bell’s findings confirm what many suspected from the start. The vaccine’s components didn’t stay localized. They spread throughout the body, reaching the ovaries, liver, adrenal glands, and even the brain. Pfizer knew this from the jump, starting with its pre-approval animal studies, and regulators knew it too. But instead of warning the public, they just said what they needed to say to secure compliance.

SOURCE

Modified RNA (mRNA) had not been used on a mass level in humans before. Normal mRNA (messenger RNA or ribonucleic acid) in our bodies is a copy of a segment of our own DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid, our genes) that our cells use to manufacture proteins. Such proteins are then used within the cell or excreted (for example, into the blood as albumin, or cell walls as keratin or hair). This mRNA only lasts hours or days. The mRNA vaccines are modified (one of four bases, uridine, is replaced by pseudouridine). This makes them persist longer than our own mRNA so that they can produce more protein over a much longer period. Studies have shown that this works, with modified RNA and spike protein detectable weeks or months after injection. These were not shocking revelations but intended outcomes of drug design. The problem is that the public were told, in 2020 and 2021, that the vaccines act like their own mRNA and rapidly break down. This sounds safer. The public were deliberately misinformed, an unquestionable breach of basic informed consent, to make them more likely to agree to be vaccinated.

When we want a drug to disseminate quickly throughout the body, we often inject it into a muscle. We do this with hydrocortisone to treat allergic reactions, or penicillin to ensure that it spreads quickly to wherever an infection is. Muscles have a lot of tiny blood and lymph vessels that carry injected material to the large vessels from where it is pumped through the body in the bloodstream. While the lipid nanoparticles enclosing the mRNA vaccines are designed to enter cells quickly, it is inevitable that quite a lot will go far beyond the muscle. Before the Covid vaccines were approved, studies by Pfizer/BioNTech using the same lipid but enclosing a fluorescent marker showed just that (and presumably similar studies not in the public domain by Moderna show the same). About 25% or so left the muscle and went around the body, as any competent doctor or pharmacist would expect.

Then there were the famous claims that the vaccines were “safe for pregnancy.” Yep, you guessed it… that wasn’t entirely true either.

Despite early animal data showing fertility issues and fetal abnormalities, the CDC and WHO pushed the vaccine for pregnant women and children without long-term human trials. Informed consent was literally tossed out the window.

The reason why many medical professionals and our regulatory bodies allowed mRNA vaccines to be given to pregnant women and children without good data is a mystery to many. It’s a good question for people to directly ask the medical practitioners who prescribed it, noting the information above that the manufacturers themselves should agree with. Asking questions is often a good idea. Certainly, the messaging that it is safe in pregnancy was not based on any good evidence, because we did not know in humans and the actual Phase 3 trials by Pfizer and Moderna avoided addressing that question. We only knew, from Pfizer/BioNTech’s data on rats, that it greatly increased both failure to become pregnant and a wide range of fetal malformations compared to unvaccinated rats from the same batch.

Animal studies showing reduced fertility or deformed babies would normally lead to more trials, but they didn’t. Why? That is a question for Pfizer, Moderna and our regulatory agencies. It seems, from the Australian Therapeutic Drug Administration’s (TGA) report, that such genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies (for DNA mutations and cancer) were cut short or ignored because the TGA did not think they would last very long (though, as noted above, they were designed to). The name of the products was also changed from ‘genetic therapeutics’ (which generally require such studies) to ‘vaccines’ (which don’t). Science can be quite special.

But what’s most shocking about Bell’s essay is how the entire vaccine, and the science behind it, were essentially redefined for political convenience.

The reclassification of mRNA from “gene therapy” to “vaccine” quietly removed the need for the genotoxicity and cancer studies that would normally have been required. This wasn’t a minor bureaucratic adjustment, folks; it was a full-blown regulatory escape hatch.

Bell also reminds readers that the entire Covid era served as a moral stress test, and as we witnessed, nearly every institution failed. Doctors followed orders. Politicians followed money. The public followed fear.

DEBRIEFING

What Dr. Bell’s analysis makes painfully clear is that Covid wasn’t just a health crisis; it was a crisis in public trust. The vaccine rollout exposed something far more dangerous than a virus: the absolute corruption of science when it’s merged with politics and profit.

Public health agencies didn’t simply make mistakes; they made calculated choices. They twisted definitions, buried data, and expertly silenced dissent. They told people what was “safe” and “patriotic,” not because it was 100% true, but because it served a larger agenda. And doctors became enforcers of a narrative rather than those who serve public health.

The biggest deception here wasn’t that the vaccine failed; it’s that it succeeded exactly as intended: as a test of obedience, compliance, and how far the whole system could go before people started asking questions.