Ayşe Yılmaz,1 Öztürk Taşkın,1 Ufuk Demir,1 and Veysel G Soylu2
Cureus. 2023 Jan; 15(1): e34173. Published online 2023 Jan 24 doi: 10.7759/cureus.34173 PMCID: PMC9950690PMID: 36843833
Abstract
Background
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in high mortality among patients in critical intensive care units. Hence, identifying mortality markers in the follow-up and treatment of these patients is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between mortality rates in patients with COVID-19 and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic inflammation response index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI).
Methodology
In this study, we assessed 466 critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in the adult intensive care unit of Kastamonu Training and Research Hospital. Age, gender, and comorbidities were recorded at the time of admission along with NLR, dNLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI values from hemogram data. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores and mortality rates over 28 days were recorded. Patients were divided into survival (n = 128) and non-survival (n = 338) groups according to 28-day mortality.
Results
A statistically significant difference was found between leukocyte, neutrophil, dNLR, APACHE II, and SIRI parameters between the surviving and non-surviving groups. A logistic regression analysis of independent variables of 28-day mortality identified significant associations between dNLR (p = 0.002) and APACHE II score (p < 0.001) and 28-day mortality.
Conclusions
Inflammatory biomarkers and APACHE II score appear to be good predictive values for mortality in COVID-19 infection. The dNLR value was more effective than other biomarkers in estimating mortality due to COVID-19. In our study, the cut-off value for dNLR was 3.64.
Introduction
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for one of the longest pandemics in world history [1]. Studies continue to reveal correlations between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer [2]. Furthermore, it has been reported that the virus affects cellular responses and has direct effects on mortality rates and causes [3].
Neutrophils are abundant in circulation, and during infection, they phagocytize microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi using neutrophil extracellular traps. However, the role and function of this mechanism during viral infections remain unclear. In postmortem examinations of patients who died from COVID-19, intense neutrophil activity was observed in the alveolar space and pulmonary capillary endothelium [4]. Increased neutrophil levels and decreased lymphocyte levels have also been observed. In particular, the ratio of absolute neutrophils to lymphocytes (NLR), calculated as neutrophil count/lymphocyte count, is significantly increased and associated with a higher risk of mortality [5,6]. A study of 245 patients with COVID-19 showed an 8% higher risk of in-hospital death for each unit increase in NLR [7].
The derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) is calculated as the neutrophil count/(white blood cell count – neutrophil count). Unlike the NLR, the difference between white blood cell and neutrophil values used in the denominator refers to monocytes and other granulocytes. Thus, NLR may better reflect the severity of infections that cause rapid increases in neutrophil production and release of poorly differentiated neutrophils [8]. The monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) is calculated as monocyte count/lymphocyte count, and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is calculated as platelet count/lymphocyte count.
The systemic inflammation response index (SII) was first described by Hu et al. [9], who showed that high SII scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were associated with higher recurrence rates. It is calculated as neutrophil count × (platelet count/lymphocyte count). The systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) is calculated as neutrophil count × (monocyte count/lymphocyte count) and can reflect immune and inflammatory balance [10].
In recent studies, the NLR, dNLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI have all been shown to be reliable predictors of the severity of COVID-19 infection [11,12]. Our study aimed to further evaluate the relationship between these values and mortality in COVID-19.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study, which complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, Patient Rights Regulation, and ethical rules, was approved by the Kastamonu University Medical Research Ethics Committee (decision number: 2022-KAEK-140). Between January 2020 and January 2021, 466 critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to the adult intensive care unit of Kastamonu Training and Research Hospital were included in the study. Patient data (e.g., age, gender, and comorbidities) were collected from the hospital information management system and patient records. NLR, dNLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI values were derived from hemogram data at the time of admission to the intensive care unit. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) values and mortality rates over 28 days were also recorded. Patients were then divided into survival (n = 128) and non-survival (n = 338) groups according to 28-day mortality. The previously described formulas were used to calculate the values [13].
Statistical calculations were conducted using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared using independent-sample t-tests. Categorical variables are described as numbers and percentages and compared using Fisher’s exact test. Finally, the predictive performance of the death indices was evaluated by estimating the area under the curve and using the corresponding receiver operating characteristic curve method.
Results
Of the 466 patients with COVID-19 in the study, 338 (73.2%) died within 28 days of admission to the intensive care unit and 128 (26.8%) survived longer than 28 days. Analysis between groups revealed statistically significant differences in leukocyte count (p = 0.013), neutrophil count (p = 0.003), and dNLR (p = 0.003) upon admission to the intensive care unit. The non-survival group also had significantly higher APACHE II scores (23.90 ± 5.50; p < 0.001) and higher SIRI values (8.90 ± 14.79; p = 0.047). Table Table11 summarizes the results.
Table 1
Demographic data of patients, comorbidities, hemogram parameters for admission to the intensive care unit, as well as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, between January 2020 and January 2021.
| Variable | Total (n = 466 SD) | Non-survival group (n = 338; 72.5%) Mean ± SD | Survival group (n = 128; 27.5%) Mean ± SD | P-value | |
| Age (years) | 72.03 ± 12.76 | 72.69 ± 12.66 | 70.29 ± 12.89 | 0.070 | |
| Gender | Female | 201 (37.8%) | 138 (38.3%) | 63 (36.6%) | 0.103 |
| Male | 265 (62.2%) | 200 (61.7%) | 65 (63.4%) | ||
| Comorbidity | Yes | 352 (73.3%) | 251 (73.2%) | 101 (73.8%) | 0.298 |
| No | 114 (26.7%) | 87 (26.8%) | 27 (26.2%) | ||
| ≥2 comorbidities | 173 (35.2%) | 117 (34.5%) | 56 (37.2%) | 0.068 | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 109 (22.6%) | 79 (23.0%) | 30 (21.5%) | 0.988 | |
| Hypertension | 188 (39.8%) | 130 (38.9%) | 58 (57.9%) | 0.178 | |
| Renal disease | 63 (11.5%) | 45 (12.1%) | 18 (9.8%) | 0.953 | |
| Cardiovascular disease | 131 (30.4%) | 92 (30.9%) | 39 (29.3%) | 0.486 | |
| Respiratory disease | 78 (14.2) | 59 (14.5%) | 19 (13.4%) | 0.593 | |
| Leukocyte (103/µL) | 10.56 ± 4.43 | 10.84 ± 4.69 | 9.83 ± 3.56 | 0.013 | |
| Platelet (103/µL) | 214.38 ± 86.43 | 214.82 ± 88.77 | 213.23 ± 80.27 | 0.853 | |
| Neutrophil (103/µL) | 8.78 ± 4.32 | 9.15 ± 4.58 | 7.82 ± 3.35 | 0.003 | |
| Lymphocyte (103/µL) | 0.88 ± 0.63 | 0.87 ± 0.66 | 0.90 ± 0.54 | 0.581 | |
| Monocyte (103/µL) | 0.71 ± 2.82 | 0.73 ± 3.31 | 0.65 ± 0.42 | 0.658 | |
| Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio | 15.58 ± 17.22 | 16.32 ± 17.22 | 13.63 ± 17.14 | 0.132 | |
| Platelet/lymphocyte ratio | 356.29 ± 347.51 | 365.56 ± 370.07 | 331.79 ± 279.16 | 0.290 | |
| Monocyte/lymphocyte ratio | 0.87 ± 0.98 | 0.89 ± 1.09 | 0.83 ± 0.59 | 0.440 | |
| Derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio | 7.10 ± 6.77 | 6.15 ± 0.33 | 8.04 ± 0.71 | 0.005 | |
| Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score | 22.54 ± 5.90 | 23.90 ± 5.50 | 18.92 ± 5.40 | <0.001 | |
| Systemic inflammation response index | 3,409.31 ± 4,325.28 | 3,582.91 ± 4,423.03 | 2,950.89 ± 4,036.61 | 0.143 | |
| Systemic inflammatory response index | 8.35 ± 13.12 | 8.90 ± 14.79 | 6.90 ± 6.81 | 0.047 | |
A logistic regression analysis identified dNLR (p = 0.002) and APACHE II score (p < 0.001) as significant predictors of 28-day mortality. However, according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the dNLR value (area under the curve = 0.621) was found to have a low sensitivity of 70.1% and a specificity of 51.6%, with a cut-off of 3.64. Table Table22 summarizes the results of the logistic regression, and Figure Figure11 illustrates the results of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Table 2
Logistic regression analysis
| Variable | Β | SE | P-value | Exp(β) | 95% confidence interval for Exp(β) | |
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| Constant | -3.573 | 0.547 | 0.000 | 0.028 | ||
| Derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio | 0.066 | 0.022 | 0.002 | 1.069 | 1.024 | 1.115 |
| Systemic inflammatory response index | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.371 | 1.009 | 0.990 | 1.028 |
| Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score | 0.189 | 0.025 | <0.001 | 1.208 | 1.151 | 1.268 |
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
dNLR: derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; APACHE II: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II
Discussion
The results of our study showed a statistically significant difference between leukocyte, neutrophil, dNLR, APACHE II, and SIRI parameters between the survival and non-survival groups. According to the logistic regression analysis, dNLR (p = 0.002) and APACHE II score (p = <0.001) were significantly associated with 28-day mortality among participants.
Zhu et al. showed a higher mortality rate among patients with a higher white blood cell count at the time of admission in COVİD-19 patients, even when the index values were within the normal range [14]. Other studies indicate that the white blood cell value is average or decreased in COVID-19 [15,16]. In our study, a statistically significant difference was found between the survival and non-survival groups, but the white blood cell count was not found to have a substantial predictive value regarding morality.
Ghobadi et al. examined the role of NLR, PLR, MLP, dNLR, NLPR, AISI, SIRI, and SII values in predicting mortality in elderly and non-elderly patients with COVID-19. PLR, MLR, dNLR, NLPR, AISI, SIRI, and SII values were high in non-survivors (both in the elderly and non-elderly groups). The study concluded that white blood cell and neutrophil levels could be reliable predictors of mortality in COVID-19 infection [17]. The results of our study, which showed that the neutrophil value differed significantly between the survival and non-survival groups, support their conclusion. Citu et al. assessed 108 patients with COVID-19 and found that NLR, dNLR, and MLR values showed significant predictive value for mortality, but PLR and SII did not [18]. We similarly found that PLR and SII values were not significant predictors of mortality.
In a retrospective study of 807 people in Mexico with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome, Gutiérrez-Pérez et al. found that the neutrophil to hemoglobin and lymphocyte ratio, red blood cell distribution width, as well as NLR, SII, and SIRI values, could predict severe COVID-19, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation support, and a low survival rate during hospitalization [19]. Another study by Halmaciu et al. assessed disease progression and the predictive value of the Inflammation Index (AISI) and total system score (TSS) for invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with high levels of serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) and COVID-19; they found that high MLR, NLR, SII, SIRI, AISI, IL-6, and TSS values were strong predictors of invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality [20]. Arbănaşi et al. examined predictors of thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients and found that high MLR, NLR, PLR, SII, SIRI, AISI, and CT Severity Score values at admission accurately predicted acute lung injury, intensive care admission, and mortality [21]. Eissa et al. compared 88 patients with COVID-19 infection to 41 healthy control subjects and demonstrated that NLR >2.5, PLR >118, NLPR >0.0105, SIRI >0.8, CRP/L >7.6, and LMR <6 were essential values in the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 [22]. Our study similarly found that the dNLR value was associated with mortality.
Our study had some limitations. Our research was conducted in a single center, and the study period included peak transmission and infection rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, it included participants with unknown immunization status (vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated against COVID-19).
Conclusions
The recent COVID-19 pandemic underscores the importance of identifying mortality markers in the follow-up and treatment of critical diseases, especially in preparation for future outbreaks. In this retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to the intensive care unit, inflammatory biomarkers and the APACHE II score were good predictors of mortality risk. Among NLR, dNLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI biomarkers calculated on admission, dNLR was most effective in estimating mortality related to COVID-19 disease (cut-off = 3.64; area under the curve = 0.621; sensitivity = 70.1%; and specificity = 51.6%). dNLR value is valuable as a mortality precursor in COVID-19 due to its quick and easy calculation feature.